joegratz.net

27 July 2008

N.D. Cal. Savages Savage

Judge Ilston of the Northern District of California held on Friday that the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ use of a four-minute clip of Michael Savage’s radio show in order to criticize the views espoused in that clip was fair use. This is an unremarkable result: CAIR used the material for purposes of criticism, a core fair use.

What is somewhat more remarkable is the procedural posture: Judge Ilston made the fair use determination on CAIR’s Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings. Like Judge Pregerson’s opinion last year in Burnett v. Twentieth Century Fox, 2007 WL 1662343 (C.D. Cal. June 4, 2007), Judge Ilston found the fair use defense to be clear from the face of the pleadings, without any development of the factual record through discovery.

This latest example of a court finding fair use to be ’self-evident’ bodes well for the plaintiff in Lenz v. Universal, in which Ms. Lenz argues that her 29-second video of her baby dancing to a Prince song was self-evident fair use, rendering Universal’s takedown notice improper.

Linkblog Atom Feed

Disclaimer Haiku:
West wind seems to say,
"This is not legal advice;
I'm not your lawyer."

(And if you're a client with whom I have a preexisting attorney-client relationship, this still isn't legal advice.)

In case you're wondering, this blog is also not intended as advertising, as a representation of anything but my personal opinion, or as an offer of representation.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.
[powered by WordPress.]
[generated in 0.438 seconds.]