<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessig Gets It Wrong On Register&#8217;s 115 Reform Proposal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2005/06/25/lessig-gets-it-wrong-on-registers-115-reform-proposal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2005/06/25/lessig-gets-it-wrong-on-registers-115-reform-proposal/</link>
	<description>News and Analysis on Copyright, Trademark, Internet Law, and Culture from San Francisco Attorney Joe Gratz</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: IPTAblog</title>
		<link>http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2005/06/25/lessig-gets-it-wrong-on-registers-115-reform-proposal/#comment-2693</link>
		<dc:creator>IPTAblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joegratz.net/?p=680#comment-2693</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Compulsory Licensing Reform&lt;/strong&gt;

As previously reported, Register of Copyrights Marybeth Peters testified before the House Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property and set forth a proposal to revoke the statutory compulsory license for making and distributing pho...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Compulsory Licensing Reform</strong></p>
<p>As previously reported, Register of Copyrights Marybeth Peters testified before the House Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property and set forth a proposal to revoke the statutory compulsory license for making and distributing pho&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lessig Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2005/06/25/lessig-gets-it-wrong-on-registers-115-reform-proposal/#comment-2692</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessig Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joegratz.net/?p=680#comment-2692</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wow -- I said that?&lt;/strong&gt;

So I posted a notice about the Register's testimony about section 115. I'm in the middle of the cc-iCommons-Summit, so I didn't have much time to say anything of substance. My post simply points again to the 1967 testimony about compulsory licenses,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wow &#8212; I said that?</strong></p>
<p>So I posted a notice about the Register&#8217;s testimony about section 115. I&#8217;m in the middle of the cc-iCommons-Summit, so I didn&#8217;t have much time to say anything of substance. My post simply points again to the 1967 testimony about compulsory licenses,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Importance of...</title>
		<link>http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2005/06/25/lessig-gets-it-wrong-on-registers-115-reform-proposal/#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator>The Importance of...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joegratz.net/?p=680#comment-2686</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gratz on Lessig on 17 USC 115 Reform&lt;/strong&gt;

Joe Gratz takes Larry Lessig to task for his critical statement regarding the Copyright Office's proposed reform of 17 USC 115 (Lessig Gets It Wrong On Registers 115 Reform Proposal). I was similarly critical yesterday, though my comments focused on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gratz on Lessig on 17 USC 115 Reform</strong></p>
<p>Joe Gratz takes Larry Lessig to task for his critical statement regarding the Copyright Office&#8217;s proposed reform of 17 USC 115 (Lessig Gets It Wrong On Registers 115 Reform Proposal). I was similarly critical yesterday, though my comments focused on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
