<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Summary of Chris Sprigman&#8217;s Reform(aliz)ing Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2004/08/26/a-summary-of-chris-sprigmans-reformalizing-copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2004/08/26/a-summary-of-chris-sprigmans-reformalizing-copyright/</link>
	<description>News and Analysis on Copyright, Trademark, Internet Law, and Culture from San Francisco Attorney Joe Gratz</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Branko Collin</title>
		<link>http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2004/08/26/a-summary-of-chris-sprigmans-reformalizing-copyright/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Branko Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2004/08/26/a-summary-of-chris-sprigmans-reformalizing-copyright/#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the summary. I don't understand the following, though: "The license fee, payable from the user to the copyright holder, would be set such that the full cost of compliance and the full cost of noncompliance are roughly equal." 

What does that mean? Compliance to what? And how will non-registering copyright holders be tracked, if formalities are not allowed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the summary. I don&#8217;t understand the following, though: &#8220;The license fee, payable from the user to the copyright holder, would be set such that the full cost of compliance and the full cost of noncompliance are roughly equal.&#8221; </p>
<p>What does that mean? Compliance to what? And how will non-registering copyright holders be tracked, if formalities are not allowed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copyfight</title>
		<link>http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2004/08/26/a-summary-of-chris-sprigmans-reformalizing-copyright/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Copyfight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2004/08/26/a-summary-of-chris-sprigmans-reformalizing-copyright/#comment-380</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Reform(aliz)ing Copyright, Part II&lt;/strong&gt;
The very fine weblog writer/copyfighter Joe Gratz favors us with a clear, succinct executive summary of Chris Sprigman's Reform(al)izing Copyright [PDF], a forthcoming Stanford Law Review article that proposes to restore the traditional balance to cop...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reform(aliz)ing Copyright, Part II</strong><br />
The very fine weblog writer/copyfighter Joe Gratz favors us with a clear, succinct executive summary of Chris Sprigman&#8217;s Reform(al)izing Copyright [PDF], a forthcoming Stanford Law Review article that proposes to restore the traditional balance to cop&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
