<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wisconsin Requires Open-Source Voting Machines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joegratz.net/2006/01/04/wisconsin-requires-open-source-voting-machines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joegratz.net/2006/01/04/wisconsin-requires-open-source-voting-machines/</link>
	<description>Joe Gratz&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:55:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacia</title>
		<link>http://www.joegratz.net/2006/01/04/wisconsin-requires-open-source-voting-machines/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2006/01/04/wisconsin-requires-open-source-voting-machines/#comment-610</guid>
		<description>My mom is a Town Clerk in Wisconsin and has recently been to several seminars for the new voting procedures. Just a few weeks ago she was at a seminar showcasing vendors and some of the possible voting machines. Apprently the one the county liked the best was not one with a paper trail. The county people wanted all the voting machines in the county to be the same--there was (is?) no restriction like that for the whole state. My mom and I couldn&#039;t believe that they&#039;d make such a huge investment on machines with no audit trail. Looks like we&#039;ll get our way after all!

P.S. Did you get my last email?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mom is a Town Clerk in Wisconsin and has recently been to several seminars for the new voting procedures. Just a few weeks ago she was at a seminar showcasing vendors and some of the possible voting machines. Apprently the one the county liked the best was not one with a paper trail. The county people wanted all the voting machines in the county to be the same&#8211;there was (is?) no restriction like that for the whole state. My mom and I couldn&#8217;t believe that they&#8217;d make such a huge investment on machines with no audit trail. Looks like we&#8217;ll get our way after all!</p>
<p>P.S. Did you get my last email?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.joegratz.net/2006/01/04/wisconsin-requires-open-source-voting-machines/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 18:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2006/01/04/wisconsin-requires-open-source-voting-machines/#comment-609</guid>
		<description>Given the reluctance of the vendors to turn over code to state governments (such as recently in N.C. and the EFF litigation), I predict that there will be problems with this.  I&#039;m writing a paper on this stuff right now... and there&#039;s an interesting angle that might play out that I&#039;ll keep quiet about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the reluctance of the vendors to turn over code to state governments (such as recently in N.C. and the EFF litigation), I predict that there will be problems with this.  I&#8217;m writing a paper on this stuff right now&#8230; and there&#8217;s an interesting angle that might play out that I&#8217;ll keep quiet about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

