joegratz.net

May 4, 2005

Wallace Brings Antitrust Suit Against FSF

Daniel Wallace is a solo software developer and critic of the open source movement; see, for example, his comment to this post of mine. He argues in that comment that the GPL is a contract, not merely a license. Wallace’s ability to prove that claim will be central to the pro se lawsuit he recently filed in federal court against the Free Software Foundation, alleging illegal price-fixing.

I’ve downloaded his four-page complaint from PACER; it’s available here.

It will be illuminating to see how Mr. Wallace will argue that a copyright licensor’s restriction that downstream licenses to its copyrights must be granted at no charge rises to the level of an antitrust violation.

3 Comments

  1. Wallace Brings Antitrust Suit Against FSF

    How hard can it be to give away software?…

    Trackback by Firefox — May 12, 2005 @ 11:51 am

  2. [...] ion to dismiss Daniel Wallace’s pro se antitrust lawsuit, which I covered previously here. Groklaw’s coverage includes a link to the brie [...]

    Pingback by joegratz.net » FSF Responds to Wallace Complaint — June 23, 2005 @ 3:20 pm

  3. [...] ace’s pro se antitrust suit against the Free Software Foundation, covered previously here and here, was dismissed today for failure to state a [...]

    Pingback by joegratz.net » Antitrust Suit Against FSF Dismissed — December 14, 2005 @ 9:31 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Linkblog Atom Feed

Disclaimer Haiku:
West wind seems to say,
"This is not legal advice;
I'm not your lawyer."

(And if you're a client with whom I have a preexisting attorney-client relationship, this still isn't legal advice.)

In case you're wondering, this blog is also not intended as advertising, as a representation of anything but my personal opinion, or as an offer of representation.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.
[powered by WordPress.]
[generated in 0.679 seconds.]