Comments on: N.Y.: Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Under Copyright Until 2067 http://www.joegratz.net/2005/04/06/ny-pre-1972-sound-recordings-under-copyright-until-2067/ Joe Gratz's blog Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:55:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: joegratz.net » Piano Rolls http://www.joegratz.net/2005/04/06/ny-pre-1972-sound-recordings-under-copyright-until-2067/comment-page-1/#comment-445 joegratz.net » Piano Rolls Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:52:23 +0000 http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2005/04/06/ny-pre-1972-sound-recordings-under-copyright-until-2067/#comment-445 [...] al work protected? how about the performance itself?), and a lovely red herring (is this a pre-1972 sound recording?). The site is in C [...] [...] al work protected? how about the performance itself?), and a lovely red herring (is this a pre-1972 sound recording?). The site is in C [...]

]]> By: The Importance of... http://www.joegratz.net/2005/04/06/ny-pre-1972-sound-recordings-under-copyright-until-2067/comment-page-1/#comment-444 The Importance of... Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:02:29 +0000 http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2005/04/06/ny-pre-1972-sound-recordings-under-copyright-until-2067/#comment-444 <strong>Distribution Loophole in Capital Records v. Naxos?</strong> A couple of days ago I wrote about Capital Records v. Naxos, in which New York's highest court held that New York common law copyright protected 50-year old sound recordings (New York - Common Law Copyright Protects 50-Year Old Sound... Distribution Loophole in Capital Records v. Naxos?

A couple of days ago I wrote about Capital Records v. Naxos, in which New York’s highest court held that New York common law copyright protected 50-year old sound recordings (New York – Common Law Copyright Protects 50-Year Old Sound…

]]>