ALA President Attacks Bloggers
Michael Gorman, President-Elect of the American Library Association, wrote this column in Library Journal attacking bloggers. His ire is understandable, if misplaced; he apparently received vitriolic reviews of this Op-Ed [PDF] in the L.A. Times in which he questions the utility of Google’s planned digitization of hundreds of throusands of books.
But reading his Library Journal column, it sounds as if a blogger killed his brother.
First, he persists throughout the column in making fun of the word “blog”. Yes, it’s a silly word; Yes, it is an ugly word; Yes, it sounds like some creature from a “B” movie; No, most people don’t think it sounds strange anymore. Gorman succeeds only in seeming out-of-touch by making tired “Creature From The Blog Lagoon” jokes.
Second, and most unfairly, he lumps all bloggers together: they are all members of the great “unpublishable, untrammeled by editors or the rules of grammar.” I take umbrage, and so, I suspect, would Jack Balkin, Cory Doctorow, Larry Lessig, and Richard Posner, among many others. Are some blogs poorly spelled, poorly punctuated, and poorly thought-out? Certainly. But adolescent rantings and personal journals don’t reflect the blogosphere at its most scholarly, nor should they. While blogging is not exclusively a scholarly pursuit, some scholars find it furthers their work.
The most striking thing about the column, though, is how unused to receiving unthinking criticism Gorman seems. As president of a large organization with a stake in many substantial national debates, I hope Mr. Gorman gets used to it soon. Perhaps the reaction to his L.A. Times piece served as a useful practice round.
2 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Linkblog Atom Feed
Earlier this week, the BBC had an interesting article on the power of bloggers in mainstream media.
Comment by Entogal — February 26, 2005 @ 10:27 am
This piece of his is also quite incorrect with respect to Google. He describes the search results returned by Google as being “in no particular order”, which is not at all correct. The order of Google’s results is not obvious, but it’s the result of a complicated ranking formula which attempts to ascertain how trustworthy and relevant a given page is. It is this ranking formula on which Google has built its fortune and demolished all other search engines.
I also can’t help but wonder how someone in such a high position in a knowledge-oriented society and proud of his intellect would be so fond of vast over-generalizations about whole classes of people. I mean “who are the blog people?” Is he next going to write about who the book people are? Perhaps the movie or television people will be next.
Keith
Comment by Keith Irwin — March 7, 2005 @ 1:20 am