<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Summary of Chris Sprigman&#8217;s Reform(aliz)ing Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joegratz.net/2004/08/26/a-summary-of-chris-sprigmans-reformalizing-copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joegratz.net/2004/08/26/a-summary-of-chris-sprigmans-reformalizing-copyright/</link>
	<description>Joe Gratz&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:55:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branko Collin</title>
		<link>http://www.joegratz.net/2004/08/26/a-summary-of-chris-sprigmans-reformalizing-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Branko Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2004/08/26/a-summary-of-chris-sprigmans-reformalizing-copyright/#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the summary. I don&#039;t understand the following, though: &quot;The license fee, payable from the user to the copyright holder, would be set such that the full cost of compliance and the full cost of noncompliance are roughly equal.&quot;

What does that mean? Compliance to what? And how will non-registering copyright holders be tracked, if formalities are not allowed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the summary. I don&#8217;t understand the following, though: &#8220;The license fee, payable from the user to the copyright holder, would be set such that the full cost of compliance and the full cost of noncompliance are roughly equal.&#8221;</p>
<p>What does that mean? Compliance to what? And how will non-registering copyright holders be tracked, if formalities are not allowed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copyfight</title>
		<link>http://www.joegratz.net/2004/08/26/a-summary-of-chris-sprigmans-reformalizing-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Copyfight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2004/08/26/a-summary-of-chris-sprigmans-reformalizing-copyright/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Reform(aliz)ing Copyright, Part II&lt;/strong&gt;
The very fine weblog writer/copyfighter Joe Gratz favors us with a clear, succinct executive summary of Chris Sprigman&#039;s Reform(al)izing Copyright [PDF], a forthcoming Stanford Law Review article that proposes to restore the traditional balance to cop...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reform(aliz)ing Copyright, Part II</strong><br />
The very fine weblog writer/copyfighter Joe Gratz favors us with a clear, succinct executive summary of Chris Sprigman&#8217;s Reform(al)izing Copyright [PDF], a forthcoming Stanford Law Review article that proposes to restore the traditional balance to cop&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

