joegratz.net

October 18, 2003

Electronic Voting Problems

Leaked internal memos from Diebold, a maker of electronic voting machines, reveal a troubling disregard for certification requirements imposed by their customers. They show that in a number of cases over the past four years, Diebold machines running uncertified software have been used in real elections in the United States. Further, the audit trail for these machines — the tamper-evident records that allow for recounts and other ex post investigations — is easily modified. You just open it up in Microsoft Access and make whatever modifications you want.

The text of the memos can be found here. The book in which they were first published, Black Box Voting, can be found in PDF form here. If these links go down (as they probably will — Diebold has been sending out C&Ds by the score to any site who so much as links to the memos), links to additional mirrors can be found here.

This is very troubling.

2 Comments

  1. [...] ebold After a rather long delay, the judge in the Diebold case (previous coverage here, here, and here) ruled against Diebold on every major issue. This is [...]

    Pingback by joegratz.net » Victory in Diebold — October 1, 2004 @ 4:52 am

  2. I wonder if Oman had these problems in their recent all-computerized election.

    Comment by Brian Ulrich — October 18, 2003 @ 10:16 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Linkblog Atom Feed

Disclaimer Haiku:
West wind seems to say,
"This is not legal advice;
I'm not your lawyer."

(And if you're a client with whom I have a preexisting attorney-client relationship, this still isn't legal advice.)

In case you're wondering, this blog is also not intended as advertising, as a representation of anything but my personal opinion, or as an offer of representation.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.
[powered by WordPress.]
[generated in 0.626 seconds.]